'Way to go, guys! You finally handed it to 'big veteran with cancer.' Well done!" he sarcastically added. Josh Hawley and Pat Toomey celebrating their victory over veterans with cancer." "And I'll say this, the most despicable part of this whole thing is watching on the Senate floor Ted Cruz fist-bumping and then patting each other on the back when they blocked this bill. "They always have money for the war with no guardrails and no oversight, but all of a sudden they get religion on a healthcare bill for veterans," he continued. You know who can close that door? The senate and the house because they have the power of appropriation." This is the same bill that they passed, and by the way, all that nonsense that Toomey says about $400 billion of a slush fund that opens the door to that possibility. "This is how it was paid for: the fix in the House was a tiny constitutional provision. " Toomey, on the other hand, he's been against this all along, at least he's been a consistent dick, but that's not - this is nothing new," he added. "Did Ted Cruz and all those other Republicans who voted yes on this bill and then switched their vote to no, was that the provision of how the bill was paid for when they voted yes?"ĮNJOY BREAKING NEWS VIDEO? Sign up for RawStory.TV for free. "I want you to fact-check that while I am sitting here," Stewart told host Willie Geist. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Josh Hawley (R-MO) for celebrating after the bill was shot down - and then accused them of lying about their motivations. The legislation Republicans blocked sought to ensure survivors received benefits and healthcare related to their injuries.ĭuring his MSNBC appearance, Stewart focused on the majority of his fury over the betrayal at Sens. Some service members deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan suffered debilitating health effects from smoke and other toxins. military base where waste is incinerated. Your browser does not support the video tag. "I mean, if a sitting senator claim's 5th amendment right here, which is his right, that would be pretty amazing."
"I hear that and I think, Lindsey has a self-incrimination right there there are arguments on both sides of that." "On the hand, Brad Raffensperger has gone on record as saying that these phone calls from Lindsey Graham seem to suggest that I would, I should try to toss out legally cast ballots, as a prosecutor," he continued. RELATED: Trump's legal problems set to explode over the next few weeks: report It seems to suggest that she just wants information that he can provide about what Donald Trump did." "One, I believe Fani Willis said look, we're not looking at Lindsey Graham as a subject or target of the investigation, just a witness. "So there are two data points that I think are on either side of that question, Jonathan," he replied. "How much legal danger is Senator Lindsey Graham in with this investigation?"
"Glenn, you are the former federal prosecutor here," Capehart began. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) made to Georgia election officials that he should consider invoking his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination when he appears before a Georgia grand jury investigating Donald Trump.Īppearing on "The Sunday Show" with host Jonathan Capehart, Glenn Kirschner said the South Carolina Republican may be put in an awkward position if he loses his battle to duck a subpoena as he has vowed to do. According to a former federal prosecutor, there is enough evidence of criminality in a phone call that Sen.
0 kommentar(er)
